刊期:双月刊
主管单位:中国科学院
主办单位:中国科学院动物研究所,中国昆虫学会
地址:北京市朝阳区北辰西路1号院5号中国科学院动物研究所
邮编:100101
电话:010-64807137
传真:010-64807137
E-Mail:entom@ioz.ac.cn
刊号:ISSN 2095-1353
        CN 11-6020/Q
国内发行代号:2-151
国际发行代号:BM-407
发行范围:国内外公开发布
定价:138元/册
定价:828元/年
银行汇款:中国工商银行北京海淀西区支行
户名:中国科学院动物研究所
帐号:0200 0045 0908 8125 063

您所在位置:首页->过刊浏览->2025年62卷第4期



诱捕器类型和位置对胡蜂诱捕效果的影响
Effect of wasp trap type and position relative to beehives on trap performance
郑秋岚** 陈 畅 陆亦澄 郑火青***
点击:11次 下载:0次
DOI:10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2025.105
作者单位:浙江大学动物科学学院,杭州 310058
中文关键词:胡蜂;蜜蜂;诱捕器;诱捕位置
英文关键词:Vespidae; honeybee; trap; trap position
中文摘要:

【目的】 通过比较不同的诱捕器类型和位置及其组合对诱捕胡蜂效果的影响,筛选出效果最佳的胡蜂诱捕方案。【方法】 以50%蔗糖溶液为引诱剂,设置5种类型的诱捕器,包括500 mL锥形瓶(1 号)、300 mL 农夫山泉果汁瓶(2号)、500 mL可口可乐瓶(3号)、1.25 L可口可乐瓶(4号)和4.50 L娃哈哈纯净水瓶(5号);设置5个诱捕点位置,分别为诱捕器离垫高蜂箱0.3(H-D0.3)和1 m(H-D1),诱捕器离地面蜂箱0.3(L-D0.3)和1 m(L-D1),以及诱捕器挂于距离蜂箱2 m的树枝上(T-D2),开展胡蜂诱捕试验。【结果】 比较前9 d 5个位置各种诱捕器和第14天在H-D1处5种诱捕器诱捕的胡蜂数量,1号诱捕器诱捕的胡蜂数量显著高于2号、3号和4号诱捕器(P<0.05),与5号诱捕器差异不显著(P>0.05)。比较前9 d不同诱捕器和第14天1号诱捕器在不同位置的胡蜂数量,H-D1处效果最佳,显著高于另外3组(P<0.05),而H-D0.3、L-D0.3和L-D1这3个位置间的胡蜂数量差异不显著(P>0.05)。兼顾考虑组合方案对胡蜂和非靶标昆虫的诱捕效果,在离垫高蜂箱1 m处放置锥形瓶能够达到最佳的胡蜂诱捕效果。【结论】 在离垫高蜂箱1 m处放置锥形瓶这一组合方案是综合效果最佳的胡蜂防控方案,建议应用于养蜂生产中,以达到更高效、绿色的胡蜂防控效果。

英文摘要:

 [Aim]  To identify the best trap type, and position relative to beehives, for trapping wasps. [Methods]  Five types of traps were evaluated; 500 mL conical bottles (Trap 1), 300 mL Nongfu Spring juice bottles (Trap 2), 500 mL Coca-Cola bottles (Trap 3), 1.25 L Coca-Cola bottles (Trap 4) and 4.5 L Wahaha Pure Water bottles (Trap 5). Each trap type was evaluated in five different situations relative to beehives; 0.3 m from an elevated beehive (H-D0.3), 1 m from an elevated beehive (H-D1), 0.3 m from a ground level beehive (L-D0.3), 1 m from a ground level beehive (L-D1), and hanging on a branch 2 m from a beehive (T-D2). Traps were baited with 50% sucrose solution and trapping was conducted over 14 days with three replicates per treatment. [Results]  Significantly more wasps were caught by trap 1 than by traps 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.05) in all five locations over the first 9 days, and at H-D1 on day 14. Trap 1 also caught slightly more wasps than trap 5, however this difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Comparing the number of wasps caught at different positions over the first 9 days, and by trap 1 on day 14, the best position was H-D1, where significantly more wasps were captured than at the other three positions (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of wasps caught between H-D0.3, L-D0.3 and L-D1 (P > 0.05). Considering both trap type and situation, placing conical bottle traps 1 m away from elevated beehives achieved the best results (P < 0.05). [Conclusion]  Placing conical bottle traps 1 m away from elevated beehives was the best overall wasp trapping regime and is recommended as an efficient, environmentally-friendly, integrated, method of wasp control.

读者评论

      读者ID: 密码:   
我要评论:
版权所有©2025应用昆虫学报》编辑部 京ICP备10006425号
本系统由北京菲斯特诺科技有限公司设计开发
您是本站第10963279名访问者